Next: Lid-driven Cavity Up: Simple example problems Previous: Seepage under a dam Contents

## Hydraulic pipe system

In CalculiX it is possible to perform steady-state hydraulic and aerodynamic network calculations, either as stand-alone applications, or together with mechanical and/or thermal calculations of the adjacent structures. Here, a stand-alone hydraulic network discussed in [10] is analyzed. The input deck pipe.f can be found in the test suite.

Figure 24: Geometry of the hydraulic network

The geometry of the network is shown in Figure 24. It is a linear network consisting of:

- an upstream reservoir with surface level at 14.5 m
- an entrance with a contraction of 0.8
- a pipe with a length of 5 m and a diameter of 0.2 m
- a bend of 45 and a radius of 0.3 m
- a pipe with a length of 5 m and a diameter of 0.2 m
- a pipe with a length of 5 m and a diameter of 0.3 m
- a pipe with a length of 2.5 m and a diameter of 0.15 m
- a gate valve in E with = 0.5
- a pipe with a length of 1.56 m and a diameter of 0.15 m
- an exit in a reservoir with surface level at 6.5 m

All pipes are characterized by a Manning friction coefficient n=0.015. The input deck is shown in abbreviated form in Figure 25.

Figure 25: Input deck of the hydraulic network

In CalculiX linear networks are modeled by means of 3-node network elements (D-type elements). In the corner nodes of the element the temperature and the pressure are unknown. They are assigned to the degrees of freedom 0 and 2, respectively. In the midside node the mass flux is unknown and is assigned to degree of freedom 1. The properties of the network elements are defined by the keyword *FLUID SECTION. They are treated extensively in Section 6.3 (gases) and 6.4 (liquids). For the network at stake we need:

- a dummy network entrance element expressing that liquid is entering the network (element 1). It is characterized by a node number 0 as first node
- a network element of type PIPE ENTRANCE at location A (element 2). This element also takes the water depth into account. Notice that there is no special reservoir element. Differences in water level can be taken into account in any element type by assigning the appropriate coordinates to the corner nodes of the element.
- a network element of type PIPE MANNING for the pipe between location A and B (element 3)
- a network element of type PIPE BEND for the bend at location B (element 4)
- a network element of type PIPE MANNING for the pipe between location B and C (element 5)
- a network element of type PIPE ENLARGEMENT for the increase of diameter at location C (element 6)
- a network element of type PIPE MANNING for the pipe between location C and D (element 7)
- a network element of type PIPE CONTRACTION to model the decrease in diameter at location D (element 8)
- a network element of type PIPE MANNING for the pipe between location D and E (element 9)
- a network element of type PIPE GATE VALVE for the valve at location E (element 10)
- a network element of type PIPE MANNING for the pipe between location E and F (element 11)
- a network element of type PIPE ENLARGEMENT for the exit in the reservoir (element 12). Indeed, there is no special reservoir entrance element. A reservoir entrance has to be modeled by a large diameter increase.
- a dummy network exit element expressing that liquid is leaving the network (element 13)

In the input deck, all these elements are defined as D-type elements, their nodes have the correct coordinates and by means of *FLUID SECTION cards each element is properly described. Notice that the dummy network entrance and exit elements are characterized by typeless *FLUID SECTION cards.

For a hydraulic network the material properties reduce to the density (on the *DENSITY card), the specific heat and the dynamic viscosity (both on the *FLUID SECTION card). The specific heat is only needed if heat transfer is being modeled. Here, this is not the case. The dynamic viscosity of water is N s/m [29]. The boundary conditions reduce to the atmospheric pressure in node 3 and 25, both at the liquid surface of the reservoir. Remember that the pressure has the degree of freedom 2 in the corner nodes of the network elements.

Networks are only active in *COUPLED TEMPERATURE-DISPLACEMENT or *HEAT TRANSFER procedures. Here, we do not take the structure into account, so a heat transfer analysis will do. Finally, the gravity loading has to be specified, this is indeed essential for hydraulic networks. Regarding the nodal output, remember that NT requests degree of freedom 0, whereas U requests degrees of freedom 1 to 3. Since we are interested in the mass flux (DOF 1 in the middle nodes) and the pressure (DOF 2 in the corner nodes), U is selected underneath the *NODE PRINT line. Officially, U are displacements, and that's the way they are labeled in the .dat file.

The results in the .dat file look as follows:

     displacements (vx,vy,vz) for set NALL and time   1.

         2  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
         3  0.0000E+00  1.0000E+05  0.0000E+00
         4  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
         5  0.0000E+00  1.3386E+05  0.0000E+00
         6  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
         7  0.0000E+00  1.2900E+05  0.0000E+00
         8  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
         9  0.0000E+00  1.2859E+05  0.0000E+00
        10  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        11  0.0000E+00  1.5841E+05  0.0000E+00
        12  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        13  0.0000E+00  1.6040E+05  0.0000E+00
        14  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        15  0.0000E+00  1.9453E+05  0.0000E+00
        16  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        17  0.0000E+00  1.7755E+05  0.0000E+00
        18  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        19  0.0000E+00  1.8361E+05  0.0000E+00
        20  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        21  0.0000E+00  1.5794E+05  0.0000E+00
        22  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        23  0.0000E+00  1.6172E+05  0.0000E+00
        24  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00
        25  0.0000E+00  1.0000E+05  0.0000E+00
        26  8.9592E+01  0.0000E+00  0.0000E+00

The mass flux in the pipe (first DOF in the midside nodes, column 1) is constant and takes the value 89.592 kg/s. This agrees well with the result in [10] of 89.4 l/s. Since not all node and element definitions are listed in Figure 25 it is useful for the interpretation of the output to know that location A corresponds to node 5, location B to nodes 7-9, location C to nodes 11-13, location D to nodes 15-17, location E to nodes 19-21 and location F to node 23. The second column in the result file is the pressure. It shows that the bend, the valve and the contraction lead to a pressure decrease, whereas the enlargement leads to a pressure increase (the velocity drops).

If the structural side of the network (e.g. pipe walls) is modeled too, the fluid pressure can be mapped automatically onto the structural element faces. This is done by labels of type PxNP in the *DLOAD card.

Next: Lid-driven Cavity Up: Simple example problems Previous: Seepage under a dam Contents